"What input can be provided to the school following an extended period of home schooling?"

David Celiberti, PhD, BCBA-D and Mary Jane Weiss, PhD, BCBA-D • August 27, 2020
Stock Photo by Tim Mossholder on Unsplash

This month’s ASAT feature comes to us from David Celiberti, PhD, BCBA-D and Mary Jane Weiss, PhD, BCBA-D. To learn more about ASAT, please visit their website at www.asatonline.org . You can also sign up for ASAT’s free newsletter , Science in Autism Treatment, and like them on Facebook !

My spouse and I have been providing home-based instruction with the guidance of my son Sammy’s special education teacher, BCBA, and rest of the team and we learned a lot! We had already received some parent training in behavior analytic teaching and now have had the opportunity to put these skills into practice. What should we be communicating to his school team now that this has been underway for a few weeks and how can we use what we learned as a family to guide future goals/planning?

Answered by David Celiberti, PhD, BCBA-D and Mary Jane Weiss, PhD, BCBA-D

Let’s be clear. The abrupt cancellation of educational and other services certainly caught the autism community off-guard and put families in the challenging position of cobbling together home-based learning opportunities. We recognize that some families have had a wide range of support including ongoing consultation and training, as well as virtual teaching and therapies. Sadly, some families have received little support and have had to create structures and home programming with little guidance. It is also important to recognize that every family is unique in terms of the resources that they may have to support home-based learning, as well as possible fluctuation in availability and resources to carry out home-based instruction that may occur over time.

Your question is an excellent one. Our response comes from a place that accepts that we are in a period of transition that was not planned or initially well designed. Nonetheless, there are steps we can take now, which include asking questions that will improve the quality of the home-based instruction moving forward. You will see that we have provided you with numerous questions that may help guide your conversations with his team. Furthermore, so much can be learned about how Sammy adjusts that can be shared with his team and inform future conversations, priorities, and goals. It is that spirit in which we offer you this reply.

By way of background, we want to first acknowledge some of the many contributions that parents may offer to help shape their children’s intervention efforts. Taken together, these bear tremendous relevance to COVID-19 and position you well to help improve the quality of your son’s home-based learning.

Parents were already important information providers:

  • Parents, like yourselves, are walking historians of their children’s lives and have rich, firsthand knowledge.
  • Parents have extensive familiarity with their children in a variety of settings and situations outside of school.
  • Parents often inform the selection of potential motivators (reinforcers) that can be used at school and in other settings (e.g., “he loves basketball”).
  • Parents can provide useful input about treatment targets (i.e., goals, new skills to be taught).

And now with instruction in the home:

  • Parents can more deeply participate in the ongoing selection of treatment goals.
  • Parents can identify targets that are likely to be reinforced in the natural environment (i.e., what skills are valuable for Sammy to possess right now and in the future).
  • Parents can provide the professional with important information about carryover across materials, people, situations, and settings (presence or absence of generalization), whether mastered skills continued over time (maintenance), and unexpected benefits emerging such as improved sibling interactions as a result of more structured family time (collateral effects).

Now back to your question. If your family is carrying out family-led instruction, you are likely learning a lot about your son, such as how Sammy learns, which skills readily carry over and which do not, and where he may struggle. We encourage you to maintain very close contact with Sammy’s teacher and other service providers and direct your questions to them.

We are hoping that you have already gained a better sense of the roles and responsibilities of various members of your team, particularly if your contact with the related service providers had been minimal prior to COVID-19. If you would like more guidance, our colleagues at Attentive Behavior Care recently authored an article on this very topic which may help you to determine whom would be the best person to address your questions. If unsure, it would be fine to ask, or to copy, more than one provider on your inquiry (ensuring of course that these providers have your consent to collaborate). This is a very appropriate time to develop a clearer understanding of roles, as well as a mutually satisfying agreement about the nature and frequency of communication.

Based on your observations and impressions, coupled with your existing familiarity with behavior analytic intervention, please reflect on some of the questions below, which may help you better communicate feedback and concerns to your team at school.

Related to Your Role

  • What role did you play in Sammy’s intervention before COVID-19 and how did it evolve given that Sammy is not in school? How has it continued to evolve?
  • Do you have a clear sense of your current role and what is expected of you?
  • Are you comfortable with your role? Do you feel overwhelmed? Are there specific aspects that are more challenging to you?
  • What assistance have you been provided to support that role?
  • Have you been able to express your feelings to the school about shifting roles?
  • What might you do differently to better communicate with the school (e.g., check in more regularly, set limits, say no, ask for support, request help with prioritization)?

Related to Reinforcement

  • Is the motivation system that you are using clear? Does Sammy need visual support to understand those expectations?
  • Are the motivators powerful? Does your son remain interested in them? Do you have a broad array from which to choose?
  • Do you need clarity in how best to deliver the reinforcer (i.e., how it should be set up)? Do you know exactly what to deliver, when, for how long, etc.?
  • Are new motivators needed? Do you have ideas on what they may be?
  • How can they be identified and their strength assessed (which ones may be highly preferred versus moderately preferred)? Do you need assistance keeping reinforcers motivating?

Related to Teaching

  • Do you need help structuring the day? What role can visuals play in supporting and conveying that structure?
  • Do you know which mastered skills should be practiced? Which ones shouldn’t?
  • Will you be teaching new skills? Do you understand how the new skills build on old ones, and which skills will be built on these? Are the adjustments you should make when teaching a brand new skill clear?
  • When targeting new skills, is Sammy responsive to your efforts to fade prompts? In other words, are you observing increasing independence in Sammy’s ability to demonstrate the desired skill? Would it help to arrange a video session to have someone watch and give guidance to you?
  • Do you need assistance in developing a “user-friendly system” for collecting some data to track the acquisition of his skills?

Related to Retention and Carryover of Skills

  • Are previously mastered skills still present? Are those skills consistent? Are they produced independently and in a timely manner? Are you concerned about any aspect of these skills in particular (e.g., consistency, quality of responding)?
  • If there are concerns, for which component of the skills are these observed? Be specific.
  • Given that teaching may be different than what was carried out at school, are you observing limited carry over of already mastered skills? As there can be many reasons for limited carryover, do you think this may be related to the task being set up differently? Different instructions? Different materials? Different instructors?

Related to Family Life

  • What has this experience been like for you and your family? How are things going with your spouse/partner/significant other? Other children/siblings?
  • Which aspects have been hard? Which aspects have been easier to manage?
  • Are there any skill deficits that were easier to manage before but not more challenging? What grew harder? What grew easier?
  • Are you observing an increase in challenging behaviors? Are new behaviors emerging? What are the recurring triggers or antecedents (i.e., what happened right before the behavior occurred)?
  • Do you have a sense of what “replacement behaviors” can be taught and/or reinforced (i.e., desired behaviors that may “replace” or, at least, decrease the likelihood of the challenging behavior)?
  • In light of any shifts in family life and activity, are there new skills that you believe you are well positioned to target (e.g., more independent bathroom routines, texting grandma, participating in outdoor gardening, following a simple recipe)?
  • Do you need guidance in teaching these skills such as assessing present level of performance, laying out a progression of teaching steps, or prioritizing desired outcomes?
  • Could you use any guidance in taking steps to improve the quality of the sibling relationship in general, or in certain sibling interactions more specifically?
  • With respect to sibling interaction, are there any new or different behaviors you would like to see? More of something? Less of another? Would it help to schedule joint leisure time in which siblings could play a board game, watch a movie, or otherwise spend time together?

This list of questions is by no means exhaustive, but aims to provide you with a framework for communicating your questions and concerns with greater precision and clarity.

We don’t have a sense of how home-based instruction has gone for you and what you specifically may have encountered as a family; however, in the next part of our response, we would like to highlight some of the things that families may learn that can also be shared with the school team. Here are some hypothetical COVID-19 “epiphanies” to provide a framework for the types of discoveries that can be shared with the school team.

“He needed a lot of help with making lunch.” Please reflect on important skills that have required a lot of assistance from you. Let the school know what those skills are and, more specifically, what type of help you needed to provide in order for your son to be successful.

Lesson learned: Weak skills that are observed at home often make new IEP goals. Alternatively, your providers may be able to give you suggestions on how you can target those skills more effectively at home now.

“I had no idea that he couldn’t sign his name.” As your son participates in home-based instruction, and has more opportunities to go into the community with you (to the extent feasible and safe), skills that are completely missing may become evident to you for the first time. These may not have been apparent to you prior to COVID-19. Take note of them and, if necessary, keep a running list.

Lesson learned: Although IEP meetings are a wonderful opportunity to express your priorities and needs, it is never a bad time to provide input to the school. Some skills may not need to become a formal goal but can be targeted nonetheless.

“Wow! I had no idea that he could actually load the dishwasher all by himself!” Over the last few months, you may have discovered some skills of which you were previously unaware. For any number of reasons, most students with autism are not likely to boast of newly acquired skills at school. Share this observation with the team, as the responsible parties will be happy to learn that the skills carried over. Celebrating successes is exciting feedback for everyone, and also ensures that a balanced conversation is had when you’re addressing concerns and skill deficits.

Lesson learned: Be on the lookout for emerging skills that may have been targeted at school. As progress reports are shared in the future, be sure to continue to ask for examples of newly acquired school-based skills, and how these could be practiced at home.

“My son is now an expert at watering plants, setting the table, and can double knot his shoes.”

In a related vein, it is quite likely that new skills you have taught– perhaps even some that are unexpected– have emerged over the last few weeks while your son has been at home. Share these clearly and proudly with school staff. As suggested above, it may be helpful to write these down so they can he shared later, and so that they are maintained and generalized to school once normal activities resume.

Lesson learned: It is far better to over-communicate than to under communicate, when it comes to newly acquired skills. Communication about expectations is the soil in which consistency can take root. Further, it allows the team to add it to their knowledge base about your child, giving them more information with which to make their recommendations.

Finally, we want to offer five “take-away” suggestions that may help you look to the future and guide some of your communications and priorities in the months ahead:

1. Self-advocate. If you need more help, ask. If you feel overwhelmed, say so; and ask for assistance in developing a more feasible and manageable role (both now and in the future). If the schedule and expectations become unmanageable at a later time, let the team know. If you want to play a larger role, articulate what is driving that and what that might look like. If you need more training, ask yourself what you want to do better and discuss that with your team.

2. Go easy on yourself. There was and is no blueprint for how to manage the myriad of disruptions, obstacles, and losses associated with COVID-19. Sometimes we can be our own worst enemy so give yourself grace. It is OK not to be amazing everyday. Perhaps realistic, weekly goals can be helpful (“Next week, I want to try to do better at …”).

3. Embrace what you have learned. Although this pandemic has brought much stress and sadness to so many families, this crisis has provided opportunities for learning. All of us – parents and professionals alike – can grow and benefit from the many lessons learned. The task ahead is how to translate these new skills, knowledge, and experiences into long-term gains.

4. Work toward a shared vision for your son’s future. Such a vision should be discussed widely, operationalized, and revisited frequently. Questions for teams to consider may include:

  • “What is our mission for Sammy this year?” “What do we want most to accomplish?”
  • “What is the single most important IEP goal that trumps all others?”
  • “What will Sammy need in 5 years?” “How do we get there?”
  • “What are the biggest barriers and obstacles for future success?” “Which of these relate to Sammy?” “Which relate to his services?”
  • “Are we on the right path?” “If so, what needs to continue?” “If not, what should change and what can we do differently now?”’
  • “Is Sammy able to participate in these conversations” “Is there a mechanism to engage him in goal selection and decision making?” “What would be needed to make that a meaningful experience for him?”

5. Communicate, communicate, and don’t forget to communicate. By way of a quick review, this would pertain to your concerns, your questions, and your achievements as a family.Please take the time to review the other related articles in this special issue of Science in Autism Treatment and we wish you all the best in the months ahead.

Citation for this article:

Celiberti, D., & Weiss, M. J. (2020). A Clinical Corner on home schooling during COVID-19: What questions, concerns, and input can be provided to the school? Science in Autism Treatment , 17 (4).

David Celiberti, PhD, BCBA-D, is the Executive Director of ASAT and Past-President, a role he served from 2006 to 2012. He is the Editor of ASAT’s monthly publication, Science in Autism Treatment. He received his PhD in clinical psychology from Rutgers University in 1993 and his certification in behavior analysis in 2000. Dr. Celiberti has served on a number of advisory boards and special interest groups in the field of autism, applied behavior analysis (ABA), and early childhood education. He works in private practice and provides consultation to public and private schools and agencies in underserved areas. He has authored several articles in professional journals and presents frequently at regional, national, and international conferences. In prior positions, Dr. Celiberti taught courses related to ABA at both undergraduate and graduate levels, supervised individuals pursuing BCBA certifications, and conducted research in the areas of ABA, family intervention, and autism.

Mary Jane Weiss, Ph.D., BCBA-D, LABA, is a Professor at Endicott College, where she has been for 9 years, and where she serves as the Executive Director of ABA and Autism Programs, including directing the Ph.D. Program in ABA. Dr. Weiss also does research with the team at Melmark. She has worked in the field of ABA and Autism for over 35years. She received her Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from Rutgers University in 1990 and she became a Board Certified Behavior Analyst in 2000. She previously worked for 16 years at the Douglass Developmental Disabilities Center at Rutgers University. Her clinical and research interests center on defining best practice ABA techniques, exploring ways to enhance the ethical conduct of practitioners, teaching social skills to learners with autism, training staff to be optimally effective at instruction and at collaboration, and maximizing family members’ expertise and adaptation. She is on the board of ASAT.

Image from https://www.ridehirta.com/invisibledisabilities
By JT Moodee Lockman February 10, 2025
BALTIMORE -- A proposed bill in Maryland would allow residents to disclose "nonapparent disabilities" on their driver's licenses or identification cards. Eric's ID Law, or HB707, [01] would require the Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) to add a certain symbol to licenses, ID cards or moped permits indicating that the applicant has a nonapparent disability. The idea was proposed by a Maryland family during an appearance on ABC's "The View," The Baltimore Banner reported. [02] The Carpenter-Grantham family had the idea after the 2020 murder of George Floyd [03] which sparked protests across the nation. "I realized that I have an African American son with an invisible disability," mother Linda Carpenter-Grantham said during the TV appearance. The bill was introduced in the state Senate during the 2024 legislative session but missed a deadline in the House. The proposed bill would require the MVA to establish public outreach programs to educate the public about the new symbols or notations. The MVA would work with disability advocates to design the symbols. The MVA would be prohibited from sharing information about an applicant's disabilities. The bill would also prevent the MVA from asking an applicant to provide proof of their disability or reject an application because the listed disability does not match other documents associated with the applicant. Under the bill, the Maryland Police Training and Standards Commission and Department of State Police would have to immediately implement training for police interactions with those who have nonapparent disabilities noted on their IDs. The bill will be the subject of a hearing on Feb. 13 at 1 p.m. What is a nonapparent disability? According to the proposed bill, a nonapparent disability is a health condition that is not immediately obvious or visible, this could include developmental or intellectual disabilities. According to a study by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), [04] common nonapparent disabilities are anxiety and depression, Alzheimer's, deafness, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder/attention deficit disorder (ADHD/ADD), and diabetes among others. People with developmental disabilities are about seven times more likely to encounter law enforcement than neurotypical individuals, according to a 2001 study by the Department of Justice. [05] Citations: [WEBSITE] Legislation: Eric's ID Law , or HB707: https://tinyurl.com/4r5s8ntp [ARTICLE] Maryland mom and her autistic son pitch a disability safety bill on ABC’s ‘The View’: https://tinyurl.com/4nzukspm [ARTICLE] George Floyd's death sparks large protests, confrontations with police: https://tinyurl.com/263hk9sk [STUDY] Living with invisible medical disabilities: experiences and challenges of Chilean university students disclosed in medical consultations: https://tinyurl.com/bdexd9js [ABSTRACT] Contact with Individuals with Autism: Effective Resolutions: https://tinyurl.com/56d6yd44 [ORIGINAL ARTICLE] Proposed bill would allow Marylanders to disclose nonapparent disabilities on their IDs: https://tinyurl.com/9k7z6nyh 
Advocates and members of the developmental disability community rallied Monday to demand legislators
By Konner Metz February 7, 2025
Advocates and service providers on the Eastern Shore are joining Maryland’s disability community to call for rollbacks on projected cuts to funding for developmental disability services. Scott Evans, executive director of the Benedictine School in Ridgely, said the near $200 million in cuts to Developmental Disabilities Administration funding outlined in Gov. Wes Moore’s proposed budget would be the worst he’s seen in his 25-year career. “Bottom line, these proposed cuts of close to $200 million in state funds would be catastrophic to the community service providers, as well as the people we support and our employees,” Evans said. “It would literally set us back years in funding.” The proposed cuts come as the state faces a near $3 billion deficit. Some advocates from the Eastern Shore note they could reduce the choices available for families and people with disabilities. Jonathon Rondeau, president and CEO of The Arc Central Chesapeake Region, says families and people with developmental disabilities on the Eastern Shore already have a limited number of options. “There are less agencies providing services for people with disabilities on the Shore,” Rondeau said. “So if there is instability in the system, it can potentially reduce choice for people with disabilities.” Evans echoed the same sentiment, and added that the cuts could hurt Benedictine’s ability to stay competitive when hiring employees. In recent years, the nonprofit school and service provider has raised wages in an attempt to attract quality employees. “All that has been an investment we’ve made because of the funding that we have received,” Evans said. “Now to wipe that funding out basically overnight means that we’re stuck in a holding pattern.” THE CUTS In Moore’s budget proposal, his office notes that in addition to the $1.3 billion set for the Developmental Disabilities Administration in fiscal year 2026, the state will “better leverage federal funding and align Maryland’s program more closely with federal guidance and practices across other states.” Evans says it’s not clear how DDA would implement the cuts, though his team at Benedictine team is working to crunch the numbers. Evans said it would cost the school hundreds of thousands of dollars of funding at the very least. Specific cuts that worry advocates include reductions in “dedicated hours” funding for those in community living programs, as well as a $14.5 million blow to self-directed services funding. “Someone who is in their late 60s and retired and chooses to stay home every day rather than going to a day program won’t necessarily have that choice anymore,” Rondeau said regarding the dedicated hours cuts. “There won’t be the funding available for that. It’ll be difficult for providers such as The Arc to support someone who may have significant health issues and need to go to the doctors.” Karenna Jones of Salisbury worries that cuts to self-directed services will impact the ability for her family to take care of her 26-year-old son, Kenneth, who has a traumatic brain injury and lives at home. Jones says as long as she lives, she “would never put (her) kid in a provider home.” But large cuts in funding may leave her with no choice. “We might be forced to do that,” Jones said. “It’s not fair.” RALLY IN ANNAPOLIS With the uncertainty swirling, hundreds packed Lawyers Mall in Annapolis Monday night, protesting for legislators to reject the proposed cuts. Leaders at the Benedictine School and The Arc Central Chesapeake Region attended, as did Jones. “I’m always amazed at how quickly the folks within the disability community can rally around a cause, and a cause that means so much to them,” Evans said. “And also, to some extent, the positive response we’ve gotten from legislators about these cuts.” Jones said the rally — organized with just three days notice by a developmental disability coalition — was inspiring and beautiful. “We were saying, ‘Save our DDA services. Save it. Don’t leave us behind,’” Jones said. Citations : [ORIGINAL ARTICLE] ‘Catastrophic:’ Eastern Shore advocates share impacts proposed disability cuts may bring: https://tinyurl.com/5ahffbu8
Advocates for people with developmental disabilities rallied at the State House Monday night in oppo
By Danielle J. Brown February 5, 2025
State Sen. Craig J. Zucker (D-Montgomery), who has a son with autism, promises to be community's ally.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies before the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance concerning his nominatio
By Michelle Diament February 5, 2025
Despite concerns about his history promoting a debunked link between autism and vaccines, a key U.S. Senate panel advanced Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination to become the nation’s health secretary. The Senate Finance Committee voted 14 to 13 this week along party lines to send Kennedy’s nomination to the full Senate, which will have final say over whether he will take over the Department of Health and Human Services. The vote came after Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said he would back Kennedy despite expressing reservations just days earlier over his anti-vaccine past. Kennedy has spent years blaming the increase in autism prevalence on childhood vaccinations. During confirmation hearings last week, Cassidy, a medical doctor, unsuccessfully pressured [01] Kennedy to concede that there is no link between autism and vaccines. But, Cassidy said he ultimately decided to back Kennedy after receiving “serious commitments” from the Trump administration. Specifically, Cassidy indicated that he’s been assured that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will not remove statements on its website highlighting that vaccines do not cause autism. Kennedy also committed to “work within current vaccine approval and safety monitoring systems and not establish parallel systems” and “maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations without changes,” Cassidy said. While Kennedy’s nomination is not guaranteed, Cassidy had been viewed as a significant question mark and his support will ease the path to full Senate confirmation. President Donald Trump has said [02] that he’s “open to anything” when it comes to investigating the increase in autism prevalence in recent decades and he’s suggested that Kennedy would have leeway to look into the causes of autism including the long-discredited connection between autism and vaccines. “20 years ago, Autism in children was 1 in 10,000. NOW IT’S 1 in 34. WOW! Something’s really wrong. We need BOBBY!!! Thank You! DJT,” Trump posted to social media just before the Senate committee met to vote this week. In fact, the latest CDC estimates suggest 1 in 36 children [03] have autism compared to 1 in 150 in 2000. Kennedy’s nomination is raising concerns for several national autism and disability organizations. A dozen groups including the Autism Society of America, the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, the National Association of Councils on Developmental Disabilities and The Arc of the United States put out a statement ahead of Kennedy’s confirmation hearings saying that vaccines do not cause autism. “Perpetuating myths linking vaccines to autism does a disservice to the autism community by distracting from their pressing healthcare needs,” the groups said. Instead, the organizations indicated that policymakers should focus on actual needs in the autism community such as access to health care, mental health services, education and more. “The Autism Society is still very disturbed that Mr. Kennedy has not clearly stated that vaccines are not linked to autism,” Christopher Banks, president and CEO of the Autism Society of America, said after Kennedy’s nomination advanced. “Any direction to reinvestigate debunked myths, will reverse progress, and deter funding that addresses healthcare inequities and services that the autism community needs now.” Citations: [ARTICLE] HH S Nominee RFK Jr. declines to reject vaccine autism link: https://tinyurl.com/mkfpb32s [ARTICLE] Trump signals his administration will investigate debunked link between vaccines and autism: https://tinyurl.com/334jkspd [ARTICLE] Autism now affects 1 in 36 kids CDC says: https://tinyurl.com/3m5hve86 [ORIGINAL ARTICLE] Autism Takes Center Stage As RFK Jr. Nomination For HHS Secretary Advances: https://tinyurl.com/jmephrju
rom left, Laura Howell, CEO of Maryland Association of Community Services; Ande Kolp, executive dire
By Danielle J. Brown January 27, 2025
Despite some conversations between state officials and the disability community, advocates say they’re not being heard.
A public service announcement from Autism Speaks offers information about the signs of autism. (Ad C
By Shaun Heasley January 15, 2025
New estimates show that 61.8 million people around the globe have autism and that the developmental disability is among the most common health issues facing youth. As of 2021, researchers found that 1 in 127 people worldwide were on the spectrum, according to findings published [01] recently in the journal The Lancet. Autism was twice as likely to affect males versus females and there was high prevalence among young people, with the condition ranking in the top 10 causes of non-fatal health burden for those under age 20, the study found. The findings are based on a review of studies and data that was conducted as part of the Global Burden of Diseases 2021 Study, which is considered the largest scientific effort to measure the prevalence and impact of various conditions. The autism rate identified in the new study “substantially changed estimates” from the last version of the report in 2019, but the researchers attributed the increase to updates in their methodology, in particular excluding studies that were likely to undercount prevalence. Researchers identified variances in prevalence by geography with autism affecting 1 in 163 people in tropical Latin America versus 1 in 65 people in the higher-income Asia Pacific region. “There are many factors contributing to this wide range, including varying exposures to risk factors, cultural variation, behavioral norms, or screening tools and diagnostic tools being used in those locations, and also how people are responding to these surveys, or whether they even choose to respond or participate in the survey in the first place,” said Dr. Damian Santomauro, an affiliate assistant professor at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington who led the study. “Work is currently ongoing to explore ways to quantify and correct for these differences so we can paint the most accurate picture of the prevalence of autism globally.” The latest estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [02] indicate that 1 in 36 American children are on the autism spectrum. That figure is based on data collected on 8-year-olds in 2020. By contrast the rate was 1 in 150 in 2000. Experts attribute the rise in diagnosis to greater awareness of the developmental disorder. Those behind the new study say they hope their findings will prompt better policies and greater supports for individuals with autism around the world. “The prevalence and health burden of autism persisted across the lifespan,” Santomauro said. “These findings highlight the need for early detection and lifelong supportive services for autistic individuals.” Citations: [ARTICLE] The global epidemiology and health burden of the autism spectrum: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021: https://tinyurl.com/4xwk9ebm [ARTICLE] Autism now affects 1 in 36 kids, CDC says: https://tinyurl.com/3m5hve86  [ORIGINAL ARTICLE] Autism Affects More Than 60 Million Worldwide, Study Finds: https://tinyurl.com/24fz2bs3
By Karen Lee January 2, 2025
The infrastructure to train and keep direct service providers for those with intellectual and developmental disabilities has been neglected, resulting in a crisis that must be addressed, writes Karen Lee. Photo by Getty Images.
Walmart is offering customers with disabilities the option to get assistance from a visual interpret
By Michelle Diament December 16, 2024
The nation’s largest retailer is piloting a new program aimed at enabling people with disabilities to shop more independently. Walmart is providing free access to visual interpreters at its stores and on its website. The company is partnering with Aira, a third-party service, to connect customers with sighted interpreters who can relay detailed information in real time about their surroundings, help them navigate or read signage, labels and more. To use the service, individuals stream live video of their surroundings through the Aira mobile phone app. Visual interpreters are trained to offer objective feedback so that users can make independent choices, Walmart said. And, since the retailer is offering complementary access to the service, company officials said that customers will be able to take as long as they need to wade through their options. Gayatri Agnew, head of Walmart’s Accessibility Center of Excellence, said that offering access to Aira is just the company’s latest move to improve the shopping experience for people with disabilities. She cited the recent addition of sensory-friendly shopping hours, making Caroline’s Cart available at every store and expanding Walmart’s adaptive product lines. “The reality is, we have tons of shoppers with disabilities who we want to make sure are having as good, if not better, of a shopping experience with us as someone who doesn’t have a disability,” Gayatri said. 
Pixabay Stock Photo
By Zoe Beketova, Yale University December 11, 2024
People with disabilities (PWD) make up 25% of the U.S. population. They face elevated mental health concerns and are more likely to utilize mental health services compared to non-disabled individuals. Yet, PWD also report higher unmet mental health service needs and barriers to accessing care. Dr. Katie Wang, Ph.D. '14, associate professor in the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences at the Yale School of Public Health (YSPH), and colleagues recently examined the experiences of PWD who engaged in mental health services. The study is published in [ 01 ] the journal SSM - Qualitative Research in Health. "We interviewed 20 U.S. adults with a wide range of visible and invisible disabilities," said Wang, a social psychologist and the study's lead author. "Participants identified ableism as a major concern when they talked about their experiences in seeking mental health services ." Ableism is prejudice and discrimination against people with disabilities, based on the belief that people without disabilities are superior. It can be conscious or unconscious and is embedded in institutions, systems, and society as a whole. It manifests in many forms, including harmful stereotypes, misconceptions, and generalizations. This can include the belief that people with disabilities are less able to contribute and participate in society; and the belief that people with disabilities are to be pitied or viewed as inspirational rather than just as normal human beings. Participants in the qualitative study [ 02 ] ranged in age from 22 to 67. Their disabilities included chronic health conditions (e.g., epilepsy), mobility disabilities (e.g., spinal cord injury), sensory disabilities (e.g., blindness) or, for a majority, a mixture of different disabilities alongside mental health conditions. Upon speaking with the participants about their experiences with mental health care providers, the researchers identified several recurring themes. A common experience cited was providers holding misplaced assumptions about the impact of disability on mental health as well as a general lack of knowledge about disability, either overlooking the connection between mental health and the disability or minimizing the role of disability in a person's life. Many participants also described providers not believing their lived experiences, being stereotyped, or ignored. "These results underscore the importance of emphasizing disability competency when training the next generation of mental health providers," Wang said. Care is a challenge for people with multiple minority identities The study also explored the quality of mental health care received by individuals with multiple minority identities, including having a disability. Such individuals often struggle with receiving professional help, yet little research exists on the issue. One of the participants, when discussing an unhelpful provider, said that it's hard for them, as a person with many minority identities, "to know which identity it is and why it triggered them [the provider]." The researchers found that having intersecting minority identities—such as being Black or transgender and disabled—presents additional barriers to receiving quality care. Systemic ableism undermines good intentions Another major point raised by participants was the systemic ableism within mental health care systems. "What struck me in particular is the findings pertaining to systemic ableism, specifically, how even well-intentioned mental health care providers can perpetuate ableism, given that they are working in a fundamentally ableist system," Wang said. "None of the people … want to hurt us, but the structures are built to hurt us and so they always will," one of the participants stated. Participants raised this point when discussing the emotional pain providers often unwittingly caused them during a mental health session. A need for better access to care A final point identified in the study was that physical accessibility barriers also present obstacles for PWD accessing mental health care. Telehealth, a form of online health care support, has been praised for mitigating some of the physical barriers that people face, but not all participants in the study could navigate virtual interactions. For example, lip reading is particularly difficult behind a virtual screen, some deaf or hard of hearing participants said. "I think what we want to be careful of, and what a lot of participants were warning against, is we should not be thinking of telehealth as a silver bullet," Wang said. "It does not fix accessibility across the board. It does not remove all access barriers. But having telehealth as an additional tool in the toolbox is definitely a benefit for the disability community." In response to the findings, the researchers are calling for systemic structural reforms such as increased training on disability competency for providers as well as the recruitment and—vitally—retainment, of disabled faculty and students to normalize discourse. For practitioners, the study recommends self-education on disability awareness and more of a focus on improving accessibility to their care, whether through increased flexibility, universal design practices, or openness to learning about disabilities. Wang stressed that ableism is more than just an interpersonal phenomenon: it is deeply embedded in health care systems. With YSPH's focus on addressing inclusivity, intersectionality, and belonging in public health and health care, studies such as Wang's shine a light on the experiences of PWD across different conditions and identities when seeking mental health support. More information: Katie Wang et al, Ableism in mental healthcare settings: A qualitative study among U.S. adults with disabilities, SSM - Qualitative Research in Health (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100498
Special Olympics World Winter Games Turin 2025 Logo
December 11, 2024
The President will host a dinner honoring Special Olympics athletes as they prepare to compete at the upcoming Special Olympics World Winter Games in Turin in March 2025.
Show More
Share by: